State ex rel Jones v. Murdoch

Amicus Brief in Support of Grand Jury Reform Remedy


The stage at which the government decides to accuse or not is important—even critical-–and must be treated as such. An indictment that turns out to be improvident is devastating to the person indicted, and completely wasteful of judicial

and legal resources. When an indictment is unsupportable, it is damaging to the integrity of the system as a whole.

For all the resources that our system invests in the

grand jury, the New Mexico Legislature wanted it to provide a more reliable result. The New Mexico Legislature was tired of New Mexico being a “ham sandwich” state, and thus

enacted the 2003 Amendments to the Grand Jury Statute.

The New Mexico Legislature intended to have a more reliable and more thorough procedure with more due process and a process closer to that provided by preliminary hearings

which are conducted in many New Mexico counties. To do this the Legislature provided for information from the target to be submitted to the grand jury, and gave

the grand jury the duty to order up and explore any evidence that tends to disprove, reduce or otherwise show a charge is unfounded. It also provided procedures such as review of competency, requiring impartial jurors and provided mechanisms for gathering evidence in order to effect its intent.

The prosecutor aide to the grand jury

must submit a target’s submission to the grand jury, or obtain the permission of the grand jury judge to not do so. The grand jury judge would authorize withholding the

information if the State showed that the target’s submission was not lawful, competent, and relevant. A violation of the procedures requires a dismissal without

prejudice. Prejudice is not required to be shown. By this approach the entire system benefits and retains its integrity.

[New Mexico Supreme Court adopted Amicus position in January 2009]

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Trace Rabern, Rabern Law | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Trace Rabern
Rabern Law

Trace Rabern has been an appellate writer for thirteen years. She graduated with honors from the... View Profile »

Follow Rabern Law :

Reporters on Deadline

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.