People v Likine

Amicus Brief of the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan (PAAM) filed with the Michigan Supreme Court.

more+
less-

This amicus brief brings the considerable resources of PAAM, and specifically the sharp appellate mind of the long-serving Wayne County Prosecutor's appellate chief, Timothy Baughman, to bear on the crux of the constitutional issue in the Likine appeal.

PAAM asserts that the Michigan Court of Appeals got it right in People v Adams, 262 Mich App 89 (2004), when it held that a defendant could not present evidence of an inability to pay; or an excuse of some kind, for not paying.

PAAM concedes that there is no willfulness element to the statute and recognizes that the felony child support statute is "somewhat unusual" in that it posits the existence of a court order [a child support order issued by the family court], and criminalizes the failure to abide by that order, rather than criminalizing other conduct. The criminal conduct is the payor's failure to pay the stated amount at the stated time.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Constitutional Law Updates, Criminal Law Updates, Family Law Updates

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | State, 6th Circuit, Michigan | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Timothy Flynn, Clarkston Legal | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »