Attached is the amicus curiae brief I wrote and filed in the Michigan Supreme Court on Friday, November 30, 2012, concerning the issues to be addressed by the Court in the near future. Oral argument has not been set.
The case is Bailey v. Schaaf, et al., Supreme Court Docket No. 144055. The question being addressed by the Court is whether landlords and property management companies have a duty to prevent or otherwise respond to potential criminal acts or assaults perpetrated on their tenants and their guests. The Court is considering whether to extend the ostensible duty articulated in MacDonald v. PKT, Inc., 464 Mich. 322 (2001), “to involve the police when a situation on the premises poses an imminent risk of harm to identifiable invitees…to landlords and other premises proprietors, such as the defendant apartment complex and property management company.”
The outcome of this case will have significant impact on commercial and residential property owners, property management companies, and their insurers.
If anyone has any questions concerning this case, please do not hesitate to call or e-mail me. Thanks, Carson
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, Insurance Updates, Personal Injury Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates
Reference Info:Appellate Brief | State, 6th Circuit, Michigan | United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Carson Tucker, Lacey & Jones, LLP | Attorney Advertising