Another Federal Court Finds "Fluctuating Workweek" Overtime Compensation Violates Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act


Recently, Judge Mitchell Goldberg of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued a decision in Verderame v. RadioShack Corp., finding that the "fluctuating workweek" method of overtime compensation violates the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act ("PMWA"). Under the fluctuating workweek method, an employee receives a guaranteed fixed weekly salary for all straight-time earnings, regardless of the number of hours worked, and an additional one-half of the employee's regular rate for all hours worked over forty in the workweek. The employee's regular rate may change from week to week, because it is based upon the employee's actual hours worked. The fluctuating workweek method is expressly permitted by the Fair Labor Standards Act's regulations and used by employers to compensate non-exempt employees on a fixed salary basis while minimizing overtime costs.

Judge Goldberg's decision in Verderame is the third recent federal District Court decision finding that use of the fluctuating workweek method violates the PMWA. See Foster v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.(W.D. Pa. 2012); Cerutti v. Frito Lay, Inc. (W.D. Pa. 2011). The Third Circuit has yet to consider the issue.

The Verderame decision highlights the often forgotten facts that the requirements of the FLSA and the PMWA are not identical and that employers must ensure compliance with both laws. In addition, the growing number of decisions finding that the PMWA does not permit use of the fluctuating workweek have a much broader impact than simply for those employers that use this method of overtime compensation. Employers found liable in overtime exemption misclassification cases often seek to use the fluctuating workweek to calculate damages, as this method results in the payment of only an additional one-half of the employer's regular rate for overtime hours. If the fluctuating workweek method is not available under the PMWA, employers will be required to pay an additional one and one-half of the regular rate for purposes of damages.

Unless and until the Third Circuit weighs in, decisions like Verderame make it increasingly risky for Pennsylvania employers to use the fluctuating workweek method. These decisions also have increased the potential value of overtime misclassification cases, providing yet another reason for employers to conduct wage and hour audits and ensure that all employees are properly classified for overtime purposes.


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.