Another Open Door for an Increase in Retaliation Claims


In Kramer v. Trans-Lux Corp., the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut broadly interpreted the meaning of “whistleblower” as used in the federal Dodd-Frank Act, allowing an otherwise questionable retaliation claim to survive a motion to dismiss. This broad interpretation (the first of its kind we are aware of) could encourage an increase in retaliation claims under Dodd-Frank.
In Trans Lux, the employee was fired after telling his company’s board of directors and the SEC that his supervisors were violating the company pension plan. The employee filed suit alleging, in part, retaliation under the Dodd-Frank Act. The employer argued that the employee was not a “whistleblower” under Dodd-Frank and, therefore, could not bring a claim under this law.
Dodd-Frank defines a “whistleblower” as one who reports securities law violations to the SEC. 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(a)(6). However, a portion of the anti-retaliation provision of this federal law also lists a number of protected activities: providing information to the SEC; assisting in the investigation or judicial/administrative action related to said information; or making disclosures required or protected under Sarbanes-Oxley, the Securities Exchange Act, or any other law/rule/regulation subject to the jurisdiction of the SEC. 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(h)(1)(A).
The employer in Trans Lux unsuccessfully argued that in order to bring a retaliation claim under Dodd-Frank, the individual must have both engaged in one of the activities listed above and fit the definition of a “whistleblower.” The Court held that, given the ambiguous language of the statute, and its purpose (to protect and incentivize whistleblowers), individuals can assert a Dodd-Frank retaliation claim on the basis of either their classification as a whistleblower or their engagement in a protected activity under the Act.
Accordingly, although this is an evolving area of law, this broad interpretation could result in an increased number  of retaliation claims under Dodd-Frank.
If you have further questions regarding the Dodd-Frank Act or any other labor or employment law matter, please contact Brad Harvey, Jennifer Terry or any member of our Labor & Employment law Practice Group.
The opinions expressed in this bulletin are intended for general guidance only. They are not intended as recommendations for specific situations.  As always, readers should consult a qualified attorney for specific legal guidance.  Should you need assistance from a Miller & Martin attorney, please call 1-800-275-7303.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Miller & Martin PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Miller & Martin PLLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.