Another successful veil piercing against non-U.S. national for U.S. judgment


We have posted recently on the New York law on piercing the corporate veil, since New York law continues to be the central law one sees in international litigations in the U.S., and veil piercing could be expected to be a particularly challenging and important issue in connection with non-U.S. nationals or entities.  See for example, our discussion of false conflicts in the context of a veil piercing proceeding, and our treatment of whether veil piercing was the correct procedure to enforce an arbitral award (it was, but the claim lost on the merits).

In another ruling, the Southern District of New York decided the case styled Ridge Clearing & Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. v. Khashoggi, 07 Civ. 6611(RJH)(S.D.N.Y. 2011), the Court articulated and applied New York’s veil piercing against Adnan Khashoggi, a national of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, in the context of claims for stock purchase and delivery transactions gone awry.  The decision is post-trial; the plaintiffs in the case evidently understood that the chances of an appellate reversal were diminished insofar as the District Court made post-trial findings of fact and conclusions of law, rather than rulings on summary judgment.

The entity at issue is Ultimate Holdings, Inc., formed by one Ramy El-Batrawi.  The proof at trial was that El-Batrawi formed the entity for the purpose of conducting business for Khashoggi.  El-Batrawi did not contribute any capital to Ultimate, and even though Khashoggi did not appear to pay any role in capitalizing the corporation either, the District Court found that the purpose of the company was to make money for Khashoggi.  Ultimately Khashoggi owned the entity and “had the right to direct its activities”, even though Khashoggi made a broad delegation of power to El-Batrawi...

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.