Stegeman v Lillig

Appellant's Brief

more+
less-

After three and a half years to file an Appeal, a disabled, pro se litigant, filed the instant Brief.

Since the matter had to do with fraud upon the court by officers of the court to obtain rulings in their favors, we really believed that stair decisis and past case precedent mattered. We learned how wrong we were.

From outright being denied rulings to prevent Appellant's rights to appeal final rulings. If they refuse to give you a final ruling, you are effectively denied finality and the right to Appeal to a higher court.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Rights Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Wills, Trusts, & Estate Planning Updates, Family Law Updates

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | Georgia

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Janet McDonald | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »