Stegeman v Lillig

Appellant's Brief

more+
less-

After three and a half years to file an Appeal, a disabled, pro se litigant, filed the instant Brief.

Since the matter had to do with fraud upon the court by officers of the court to obtain rulings in their favors, we really believed that stair decisis and past case precedent mattered. We learned how wrong we were.

From outright being denied rulings to prevent Appellant's rights to appeal final rulings. If they refuse to give you a final ruling, you are effectively denied finality and the right to Appeal to a higher court.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | Georgia

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Janet McDonald | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×