Imaging Services, Inc. vs. Tower Engineering

Appellant's Opening Brief

more+
less-

Appellate brief arguing for reversal of summary judgment in case involving a warehouse fire. The question before this Court was: did the Plaintiffs/Appellants adequately present sufficient material facts to support their cause of action for negligence sufficient to overcome Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment to allow the case to proceed to trial on its merits? The trial court had held that “There is no evidence that any action or omission on the part of TOWER caused or contributed to the subject fire,” and found that additional expert testimony was required to establish causation in the case of a warehouse fire.

The Brief argues that in review of a grant of summary judgment, the role of the appellate court is well established: “In ruling on the motion the court must ‘consider all of the evidence’ and ‘all of the ‘inferences’ reasonably drawn therefrom ([Code Civ. Proc.,] § 437c, subd. (c)), and must view such evidence [citations] and such inferences [citations] in the light most favorable to the opposing party.” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co., supra, 25 Cal.4th at p. 843.)

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Construction Updates

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | State, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Richard Farkas, Law Offices of Richard D. Farkas | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »