Rickert v. Public Disclosure Commission, et al.

Appellant's Opening Brief

more+
less-

This is the opening Court of Appels brief in a case challengng Washington's false political advertising statute. The client was fined by the Public Disclosure Commission for distributing a flyer which contained statement that her opponent "voted to close a facility for the developmentally disabled" in his district.

The Washington Court of Appeals (Division II) sided with the client and found the statute over-broad. The court found that the statute infringed on the First Amendment rights of political candidates. The Washington Supreme Court later accepted review of the case and affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Rights Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Elections & Politics Updates

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | State, 9th Circuit, Washington | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Venkat Balasubramani, Focal PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »