Arbitration at the Supreme Court (2011 to 2012 Term)


Originally published in the New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer Newsletter, Fall 2012, Vol. 5, No. 2, on October 29th, 2012.

The U.S. Supreme Court took time out from its momentous work deciding the fate of the health care law and Arizona’s immigration enforcement statute to issue one regular opinion and two per curiam opinions on arbitration during its 2011 term (commencing in October 2011 and extending until June 2012). All three of these opinions are discussed below.

A. Compucredit Corp. v. Greenwood -

The Supreme Court’s sole regular opinion on arbitration this year was rendered in Compucredit v. Greenwood, 132 S. Ct. 665 (2012). In Compucredit, the Supreme Court reversed a Ninth Circuit decision finding that statutory claims brought under the Credit Repair Organizations Act (“CROA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1679, et seq were non-arbitrable, finding that a no-waiver clause in CROA was not sufficiently specific to demonstrate an intent by Congress to make an exception to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) presumption in favor of honoring arbitration agreements.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:


Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.