Arbitration at the Supreme Court (2011 to 2012 Term)


Originally published in the New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer Newsletter, Fall 2012, Vol. 5, No. 2, on October 29th, 2012.

The U.S. Supreme Court took time out from its momentous work deciding the fate of the health care law and Arizona’s immigration enforcement statute to issue one regular opinion and two per curiam opinions on arbitration during its 2011 term (commencing in October 2011 and extending until June 2012). All three of these opinions are discussed below.

A. Compucredit Corp. v. Greenwood -

The Supreme Court’s sole regular opinion on arbitration this year was rendered in Compucredit v. Greenwood, 132 S. Ct. 665 (2012). In Compucredit, the Supreme Court reversed a Ninth Circuit decision finding that statutory claims brought under the Credit Repair Organizations Act (“CROA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1679, et seq were non-arbitrable, finding that a no-waiver clause in CROA was not sufficiently specific to demonstrate an intent by Congress to make an exception to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) presumption in favor of honoring arbitration agreements.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Conflict of Laws Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »