Are We Headed Towards Decisions That Are Only Kinda Precedential?

by PretiFlaherty
Contact

It was a busy day Tuesday over at the Law Court with a full slate of oral arguments and the issuance of seven new published decisions and two Mem Decs. One decision in particular, Riffle v. Smith, 2014 ME 21, caught my attention.

At issue in Riffle was whether the plaintiffs had acquired a prescriptive easement over their neighbors’ property. The Superior Court found that the plaintiffs had established that they continuously used the land in question in an open and notorious way for more than 20 years and that the neighbors had failed to rebut the resulting presumption of adversity. As a consequence, the court entered judgment in the plaintiffs’ favor on their prescriptive easement claim.

In Androkites v. White, 2010 ME 133, the Law Court recognized an exception to the presumption of adversity when the competing estates are owned by members of the same family during the prescriptive period – the thought being that the comings and goings of family members across each other’s properties are, in the usual case, permissive. Drawing on this precedent, the neighbors in Riffle argued that friendly neighbors should be treated similarly to family members and urged the Court to adopt a “friendly-neighbor” exception to the adversity presumption. The Court, however, passed on the opportunity to adopt or reject the proposed exception because the Superior Court did not find that a friendly-relationship existed during the relevant period and the record did not compel a finding that such a relationship existed.

In contrast to the situation presented in Tisdale v. Buch, 2013 ME 95 (discussed in an earlier post, here), the issue the Court “ducked” – for lack of a better word – in Riffle was not one that appears to have come up before, let alone one that has come up with some regularity over an extended timeframe, so concerns about finally putting to an unsettled legal question to bed are not particularly compelling. Moreover, a Court might reasonably be reluctant to plow new legal ground when the record presented does not allow for a full consideration of the issue (perhaps that is the case here where the neighbors represented themselves pro se). I can see then why the Court may have concluded that perhaps Riffle didn’t present the right opportunity to consider expanding Maine law.

What has me curious, however, is why the Court saw the need to issue a published opinion to dispense with the case, particularly given the fact that the legal analysis in the opinion wasn’t appreciably more developed (because it didn’t need to be) than what one would expect to find in a typical Mem Dec.  The only thing I can think of is that perhaps the Court is interested in considering the “friendly-neighbor” exception and wants to signal that interest to the Bar – something it can’t do as readily in an unpublished Mem Dec.  If that’s the case, why not just do it in a signed opinion instead of resorting to a per curiam?

As noted in a previous post on the subject, my view is that it is inappropriate for courts to issue published decisions on a per curiam basis. But my specific concern with decisions like Riffle is that published per curiam decisions will come to be viewed as having less precedential value than other published opinions, resulting in a three-tiered system with signed opinions having full precedential value, Memoranda Decisions having no precedential value, and published per curiam decisions that are “kinda precedential.” I hope we haven’t started down that road.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© PretiFlaherty | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

PretiFlaherty
Contact
more
less

PretiFlaherty on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!