The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed an order from the lower court granting summary judgment and dismissing a claim for medical benefits under an automobile insurance policy on the grounds that an electronically generated record containing an electronic signature meets the requirement that a rejection of no-fault coverage be "in writing" under Arkansas law. Barwick v. Government Employee Insurance Co., Inc., 2011 Ark. 128 (2011). When the appellant's wife purchased insurance coverage online with GEICO she did not select coverage for medical benefits. Subsequent to that purchase the appellant, a named insured on the policy, was involved in an accident and presented a claim for medical expenses, which GEICO denied. GEICO claimed the rejection of coverage was valid under the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), found in Arkansas Code Annotated sections 25-32-101 to 120 (Repl. 2002 & Supp. 2009). The circuit court granted GEICO's motion for summary judgment, ruling that the online rejection of coverage and electronic signature satisfied the statutory requirement for a rejection of medical coverage to be in writing under the Arkansas Code. The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed, holding that there was no conflict between the insurance statute and the Arkansas UETA statute and that read together they mean that an electronic record fulfills the requirement of a written rejection of coverage.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Ken Moyle | Attorney Advertising