Asbestos Alert! Analsys of Casey v. Perini Corporation


Analysis of asbestos personal injury case. Plaintiff worked alongside Perini employees on a building construction site and later sued for asbestos-related injuries. Perini moved for summary judgment, claiming plaintiff could not show Perini caused him to be exposed to asbestos. Plaintiff opposed with a declaration from expert industrial hygienist Kenneth Cohen that, based on (a) OSHA regulations presuming all surfacing materials present in buildings before 1980 contianed asbestos, and (b) local records of an asbestos abatement done at the building site many years later, that Perini probably caused plaintiff to be exposed to asbestos. The court threw out Cohen's declaration on the grounds that it was speculative, and granted summary jdugment.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Products Liability Updates, Toxic Torts Updates, Personal Injury Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Guy Stilson | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »