Asbestos Alert! Analysis of Dixon v. Ford Motor Company


Analysis of Maryland appellate case regarding 'substantial factor' anslysis in asbestos litigation. Testimony of plaintiff expert Dr. Laura Welch was thrown out by the Court of Appeal (reversing the lower court) because her opinions that every exposure adds to the risk of disease, the risk of disease is proportionate to the exposure, and there is no safe level of exposure, were not helpful to a jury because the plaintiff had to show that the exposure was more than a negligible exposure, which Dr. Welch's opinions did not address.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Products Liability Updates, Toxic Torts Updates, Personal Injury Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Guy Stilson | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »