For Lawyers | Log In | Join | Upload
WORKING... advanced

Assembly Bill 327 (AB 327) – The Fix for Unfairness in California’s Three Strikes Law?

more+
less-

California’s Three Strikes law is often criticized for its “one size fits all” approach in sentencing a defendant with two or more prior strike convictions. Strikes include, but are not limited to, such offenses as assault with a deadly weapon or with force likely to produce great bodily injury (P.C. § 245(a)(1)), treason, murder, mayhem, vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence or while intoxicated, torture, kidnapping with bodily harm, carjacking, train wrecking, rape, selling drugs to a minor, arson, gang crimes, most sex crimes and criminal threats (P.C. § 422, as of Prop 21 in 1999).

No where was this epitomized better than when a “two striker” stole a single piece of pizza and received life in prison under the law. Indeed, California’s Three Strikes sentencing law, found in Penal Code § 667(b) to (j) and § 1170.12, and the case law interpreting it, have held that “petty theft with a prior” conviction under Penal Code § 666 is a felony subject to sentencing under the Three Strikes law.


LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Greg HIll | Attorney Advertising

×

Expand Your Reach

JD Supra gets your content noticed, increases your visibility and makes your marketing efforts hassle free...

Learn More  or  Schedule a demo