Attract and Retain Top Talent When You Cannot Compete Straight Up on Cash

PilieroMazza PLLC
Contact

One of the biggest challenges that a business owner may face is attracting and retaining top talent to help drive value and build their company. There are a variety of employee incentive compensation tools that can be used to attract and retain talent. Business owners need to consider: Which type of employee incentive tools will work best for that particular business owner’s company?

To answer that question, a business owner needs to drill down on what goal is to be achieved or which problem needs to be solved. And, regardless of the goal or problem, there are a few macro-level guiding principles that need to be considered:

  1. Strike a proper balance between “carrots” (rewards to the employee) and “sticks” (provisions to protect the company’s downside if the employee fails to deliver value);
  2. There is no one-size-fits-all solution but, instead, the more effective incentive compensation strategies provide short-, mid-, and long-term value and payout opportunities; and
  3. When properly crafted, incentive compensation strategies allow small- and medium-sized business to compete for talent with ‘value’ when they cannot compete straight up on cash compensation.

Take, for example, the following scenario:

  • The owner of a Woman-Owned Small Business (“WOSB”) government contracting firm has successfully built her company to $15 million in revenue;
  • Her business is too concentrated within two agencies, has contracts within each agency; and the WOSB owner wants to expand or diversify client base and/or contracts and grow the company to $30 million in revenue and then think about an exit event ($30 million is the revenue level at which small businesses typically start to become an attractive target for purchase by the mid- to large size government contracting firms);
  • The WOSB owner would like to bring on a strong second-in-command with C-suite experience and strong business development skills;
  • The WOSB owner must be the most highly-compensated person; and
  • The second-in-command that the WOSB owner has identified is paid an annual salary of $250,000 at his current employer and in departing would leave a $30,000 year-end bonus on the table, and the WOSB owner cannot afford to offer a $250,000 annual salary.

So, what type of employee incentive compensation tools could the WOSB owner use to put together a competitive compensation package? The company could put together an incentive compensation strategy as follows:

  • A solid base salary (set below the WOSB owner) at $215,000;
  • An opportunity for an annual bonus in an amount up to 30% of employee’s base salary, provided certain financial and non-financial performance targets are achieved;
    • Note: the annual salary and bonus=short-term value.
  • A supplemental executive retirement plan that would operatively be a 401(k)-like shadow account, into which:
    • The company would make an immediate $30,000 contribution to compensate the employee for money that he or she has to leave on the table at their prior employer, to which the employee would vest over time; and
    • The company, based on its profitability, would need to, on an annual basis, contribute an amount equal to x% of the company’s profits, to which the employee would vest over time.
    • Note: there are certain tax considerations that the company would need to consider, which go beyond the scope of this article, to retain a title to this asset (so, not compensation to employee, but no deduction to company for paying it until actually received by employee).
    • Note: the supplemental executive retirement plan = mid-term value.
  • A Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”) award to motivate and reward the employee to help build the company to the $30 million revenue level and participate, financially, in the success of such revenue building upon a sale of the company event.  This, however, does not allow the employee to participate in the pre-existing $15 million in revenue and value.
    • Note: this SARs = long-term value.

In sum, a business owner can strategically use incentive compensation tools to compete for top talent with value when cash in the moment is not an option.

- See more at: http://www.pilieromazza.com/blog/attract-and-retain-top-talent-when-you-cannot-compete-straight-up-on-cash#sthash.PtMRV9dz.dpuf

One of the biggest challenges that a business owner may face is attracting and retaining top talent to help drive value and build their company. There are a variety of employee incentive compensation tools that can be used to attract and retain talent. Business owners need to consider: Which type of employee incentive tools will work best for that particular business owner’s company?

To answer that question, a business owner needs to drill down on what goal is to be achieved or which problem needs to be solved. And, regardless of the goal or problem, there are a few macro-level guiding principles that need to be considered:

  1. Strike a proper balance between “carrots” (rewards to the employee) and “sticks” (provisions to protect the company’s downside if the employee fails to deliver value);
  2. There is no one-size-fits-all solution but, instead, the more effective incentive compensation strategies provide short-, mid-, and long-term value and payout opportunities; and
  3. When properly crafted, incentive compensation strategies allow small- and medium-sized business to compete for talent with ‘value’ when they cannot compete straight up on cash compensation.

Take, for example, the following scenario:

  • The owner of a Woman-Owned Small Business (“WOSB”) government contracting firm has successfully built her company to $15 million in revenue;
  • Her business is too concentrated within two agencies, has contracts within each agency; and the WOSB owner wants to expand or diversify client base and/or contracts and grow the company to $30 million in revenue and then think about an exit event ($30 million is the revenue level at which small businesses typically start to become an attractive target for purchase by the mid- to large size government contracting firms);
  • The WOSB owner would like to bring on a strong second-in-command with C-suite experience and strong business development skills;
  • The WOSB owner must be the most highly-compensated person; and
  • The second-in-command that the WOSB owner has identified is paid an annual salary of $250,000 at his current employer and in departing would leave a $30,000 year-end bonus on the table, and the WOSB owner cannot afford to offer a $250,000 annual salary.

So, what type of employee incentive compensation tools could the WOSB owner use to put together a competitive compensation package? The company could put together an incentive compensation strategy as follows:

  • A solid base salary (set below the WOSB owner) at $215,000;
  • An opportunity for an annual bonus in an amount up to 30% of employee’s base salary, provided certain financial and non-financial performance targets are achieved;
    • Note: the annual salary and bonus=short-term value.
  • A supplemental executive retirement plan that would operatively be a 401(k)-like shadow account, into which:
  • The company would make an immediate $30,000 contribution to compensate the employee for money that he or she has to leave on the table at their prior employer, to which the employee would vest over time; and
  • The company, based on its profitability, would need to, on an annual basis, contribute an amount equal to x% of the company’s profits, to which the employee would vest over time.
  • Note: there are certain tax considerations that the company would need to consider, which go beyond the scope of this article, to retain a title to this asset (so, not compensation to employee, but no deduction to company for paying it until actually received by employee).
  • Note: the supplemental executive retirement plan = mid-term value.
  • Note: this SARs = long-term value.
  • A Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”) award to motivate and reward the employee to help build the company to the $30 million revenue level and participate, financially, in the success of such revenue building upon a sale of the company event.  This, however, does not allow the employee to participate in the pre-existing $15 million in revenue and value.

In sum, a business owner can strategically use incentive compensation tools to compete for top talent with value when cash in the moment is not an option.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© PilieroMazza PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

PilieroMazza PLLC
Contact
more
less

PilieroMazza PLLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide