BALCA Reverses PERM Denial Based on Infeasibility-to-Train


An important goal of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is to protect U.S. workers from being displaced in the job market by foreign workers. Certain employment-based permanent residence applications therefore require the employer to obtain a Labor Certification (PERM) from the Department of Labor. 

In order to obtain a Labor Certification, the U.S. employer must prove that there are not sufficient U.S. workers who are able, willing, qualified and available to perform the work. When determining if there are able, willing, qualified and available workers, the “minimum” requirements to perform the work are compared to any U.S. applicants’ qualifications. The foreign worker who is offered the position must also meet those “minimum” requirements. Experience gained while working for the sponsoring employer may not be used by the foreign worker to meet the minimum requirements, unless certain exceptions apply. One of the exceptions involves a situation where it is no longer feasible to train a new worker to perform the work. 

On May 22, 2014, in Matter of Kentrox, the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA) discussed the infeasibility-to-train situation and held that the employer in that case had presented sufficient evidence of its infeasibility to train a new worker for position offered to the foreign worker. The employer in that case was a producer of remote site management software with over one million products deployed in carrier and enterprise networks. The employer claimed that it was in the midst of a critical product maturation phase for the following three years and that the foreign worker’s contributions to that phase were critical.  

BALCA found that the employer in Matter of Kentrox had made a credible presentation of its need to keep the foreign worker on during product maturation and frequent product updates and releases because it would take two years to train someone to his level of competency and specific product knowledge, during which time software development would stall. Although the employer did not provide documentation directly supporting its statements, BALCA found the credible statement alone to be sufficient evidence of its infeasibility train a new employee. Therefore, BALCA reversed the Certifying Officer’s denial and granted the Labor Certification.


Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.