Ballin’ Spoofers Ain’t Homies of Luxury Brands

more+
less-

As hipsters continue to rule the world, parody shirts, hats and other apparel have become increasingly prevalent, much to the dismay of luxury brand owners.  Here are some recent examples:

 

There’s also an unsavory Cartier parody, which you can find discussed here.

Even Banksy got in on a parody t-shirt of the I (HEART) NY logo.  Although not available for purchase through his website, he suggested the following way to obtain it:

Now available – the official Banksy New York residency souvenir T shirt (you have to take the jpeg to a copy store and make it yourself)

Despite seemingly obvious attempts at humor unlikely to cause confusion, luxury brands continue to aggressively police their brand by sending demand letters to these spoofers, asserting  likelihood of confusion and/or dilution by tarnishment.  The spoofers in response often cry “parody” and First Amendment rights, but just because the use may evoke humor or social commentary, it isn’t always a sure bet on a defense.  Parody defense can be quite gray and courts have come down on different sides of the issue.  If a parody confuses the consuming public into assuming source or sponsorship by the brand owner, then it often will be found to be an infringing use.  Also, where the mark is used in a crude context, this may also be found by some courts to be an unlawful tarnishing use.  An example where a court found in favor of the famous brand owner is the use of ENJOY COCAINE in view of the ENJOY COCA-COLA logo on likelihood of confusion based on survey results and tarnishment because of the negative association.  Conversely, a court found that LARDASHE for pants for plus-sized women did not infringe the JORDACHE mark.  While a parody needs to simultaneously evoke the original and a contradictory message that it is not the original so as to avoid confusion.

So which of the examples above, if any, do you think may qualify for a parody defense?

P.S.  If you like fashion or American made products (or maybe you’re a hipster), and you’re in Minneapolis this weekend, I highly recommend attending NorthernGRADE’s pop-up market.  If you’re not in Minneapolis, definitely check out when their pop-up market event comes to a metropolis near you.  It’s worth it.

Topics:  Brand, First Amendment, Likelihood of Confusion, Parody, Trademarks

Published In: Communications & Media Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Winthrop & Weinstine is an exciting, dynamic corporate business and commercial litigation law firm... View Profile »


Follow Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.:

Reporters on Deadline