Bankruptcy Court Rules Gathering Agreements Can Be Rejected - Potential Significant Impacts on Midstream Companies

King & Spalding
Contact

On March 8, 2016, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) ruled from the bench in In re Sabine Oil & Gas Corp. in a case of first impression that a midstream gathering agreement could be rejected as an “executory contract” by a debtor in bankruptcy. While most practitioners and midstream companies had assumed that such agreements, if properly structured, were “bankruptcy proof,” the Court’s decision could significantly impact midstream gatherers and require more attention to the structure of transactions.

Background -

Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation (“Sabine”) was formed by the merger of Forest Oil Corporation and Sabine Oil & Gas LLC in December 2014. In July 2015, Sabine filed for bankruptcy, citing (among other things) the substantial declines in the price for oil and gas.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

King & Spalding
Contact
more
less

King & Spalding on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide