Bar Bulletin - Volume 31, Issue 4 - December 2012: Candor and Truthfulness in Alternate Dispute Resolution


Originally published in The King County Bar Association on December 12, 2012.

An attorney’s fundamental duty to tell the truth is mandated by the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPCs), but the line between impermissible falsehood and legitimate advocacy is often unclear. In the area of alternate dispute resolution, advocates are permitted to shape communications to varying degrees depending on whether the forum is an arbitration hearing or a mediation session with more limited communications required in adjudicatory proceedings. The following strives to more clearly explain the attorney’s duty in each of these different contexts.

Candor toward the Tribunal -

Under RPC 1.0(m), the arbitrator is defined as a “tribunal” for the purposes of attorney ethics rules. Even though an arbitrator conducts informal proceedings without the trappings of an austere courtroom and black robe, the same duties owed to a judge are also owed to the arbitrator.

Please see full issue below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© JAMS | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


JAMS on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.