Bettencourt v Hennessy Analysis


Analysis of California Court of Appeal decision in Bettencourt v Hennessy Industries. Hennessy made an arc grinding machine that, while it did not contain asbestos, was commonly used in a way that caused the release of asbestos from other products (brake pads). The courr created an possible exception to its ruling in Taylor v Elliott Turbomachinery and found liability was possible against Hennessy based on the allegation that the "sole, intended, and inevitable use" of the Hennessy machine.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Products Liability Updates, Toxic Torts Updates, Personal Injury Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Guy Stilson | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »