Beware of Discrimination Pitfalls in Recruitment

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Contact

Faegre Baker Daniels

In the case of Government Legal Services v Brookes [2017] UKEAT/0302/16/RN, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether a job applicant with Asperger’s Syndrome was discriminated against due to the requirement to sit a psychometric test as part of the recruitment process.

Ms Brookes, who suffered from Asperger’s Syndrome, applied to be a trainee lawyer at the Government Legal Service (GLS). Part of the recruitment process involved completing a psychometric test. Ms Brookes requested adjustments be made to the test to allow her to answer in short narrative form as the multiple choice method of testing meant that she was disadvantaged due to her condition. The GLS refused the request, instead giving her extra time to complete the questions. Ms Brookes did not pass the assessment and so was unsuccessful in her application. She brought a claim for indirect disability discrimination, among other claims.

The EAT held that the requirement to sit a psychometric test was a ‘provision, criterion or practice’ (PCP) which placed Ms Brookes at a particular disadvantage compared to non-disabled candidates. The EAT agreed with the GLS that the use of psychometric testing had a legitimate aim, but held that the use of such testing was not proportionate as an alternative method was available to them and had indeed been suggested by Ms Brookes (the presentation of her answers in short narrative format). In the circumstances, the EAT upheld the first instance tribunal’s finding that the GLS had indirectly discriminated against Ms Brookes.

This case highlights the importance for employers to ensure they have appropriate policies to support disabled employees throughout their employment, as well as candidates at the recruitment stage.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Contact
more
less

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide