Bloggers May Be Entitled to Shield Law Coverage
by Joel N. Kreizman on July 6, 2012
In Too Much Media v. Hale, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the Defendant, Shellee Hale was not entitled to the benefit of the Shield Law. She had no basis, therefore, to refuse to reveal the sources for her Internet posts which the plaintiffs contend are defamatory.
Unfortunately, many in the media, in reporting about the Too Much Media case, referred to Ms. Hale as a “blogger”. That reference led to the misconception that the Court held that bloggers are not to be considered reporters and are not accorded the privileges available to participants in more traditional media.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Civil Rights Updates, Communications & Media Law Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Joel Kreizman, Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC | Attorney Advertising