Board Lengthens Some Medical Disputes in Workers' Compensation


The Kentucky Workers Compensation Board had added another layer to cases that are called medical-fee disputes. The Board ruled recently in Workman v. Twin Resources, et al. (2005-00744) that all medical-fee disputes must be assigned to an administrative law judge for proof-taking, which often is a six-month process.

Medical-fee disputes have long been part of Kentucky workers' comp law. An injured worker can file a dispute if he/she believes an employer is wrongfully denying payment of a bill or wrongfully denying treatment. On the flip side, an employer can file a dispute if it believes a course of treatment is neither reasonable or necessary. Either side does so by filing a special motion, which names the other party as well as the medical provider as respondents. This special med-fee motion is reviewed by a Chief Administrative Law Judge. In the past, in certain cases, the CALJ has summarily ruled in favor of the moving party, provided that none of the other parties filed a response. However, if the CALJ believed that a genuine dispute existed or the other parties filed a response, then the CALJ has assigned the case to another ALJ for proof-taking.

In Workman, the Workers Compensation Board ruled that the CALJ cannot summarily decide such a motion, and must assign the case for proof-taking. The CALJ had ruled Workman's employer had established a prima facie case for the reopening, then ordered all parties to submit responses in 60 days. When neither the worker nor the physician filed a response, the CALJ summarily ruled in favor of the employer. The Workers Compensation Board ruled that the CALJ had no power to do this and was compelled to assign the matter to another ALJ for proof-taking. The Board gave no rationale, other than it seemed to believe the records themselves established a genuine dispute as to whether a proposed surgery was compensable.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Steve Burke | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.