BP International Limited v Neste Oil Oyj [2013] APO 46

by FPA Patent Attorneys
Contact

In August this year, Australian patent application 2003258753 (“the application”) directed to diesel fuel compositions was successfully opposed on the ground that the application did not disclose the best method of performing the invention known to the applicant.

Introduction

The best method requirement is set out under s.40(2)(a) of the Patents Act 1990:

A complete specification must:
(a) describe the invention fully, including the best method known to the applicant of performing the invention…’

In order to succeed on this ground, the opponent must show that at the time of filing the application, the applicant knew of a better way to perform the invention than that which is described in the specification. It is rare for an opposition to be successful on this ground as it often requires the opponent to provide information that they are not privy to. It is even more rare for an opposition to succeed for the sole reason that the best method of performing the invention has not been disclosed.

Failure to disclose the best method

The invention relates to a fuel composition containing, amongst other components, oils or fats from plants, animals or fish. During prosecution, the claims of the invention were restricted to animal fats only. New examples were also inserted into the specification to provide support for the amended claims as the examples provided in the originally filed specification only referred to oil originating from plant material.

The amended claims were held to be fairly based on the specification as filed and the claims were also found to be sufficient in that a person skilled in the art would be able to make compositions consistent with the claims.

The new examples, however, did not specify the origin of the animal fats. By omitting this information, the Hearing Officer considered that the best method of performing the invention was not fully disclosed and that the patent application therefore failed to meet the requirements of s.40(2)(a) of the Patents Act 1990.

The Applicant was given two months to amend the application to overcome this deficiency.

When must the best method be disclosed?

This decision applied the law as it stands prior to the amendments made under the “Raising the Bar” amendments which took effect on 15 April 2013. However, the decision does highlight that the law as amended may impact on the approach taken in relation to the best method requirement in the future.

Patents Act preceding the “Raising the Bar” Amendments:

The disclosure of the best method is generally provided at the date of filing. However, it was clarified in Eli Lilly v Pfizer Overseas Pharmaceuticals that the best method can be disclosed up until the date of patent grant.1

If the best method is not disclosed at the date of filing, any amendments made to the specification to later disclose the best method must be made in accordance with the Patents Act requirements for amending the specification, including that the amendment must not claim matter that is not in substance disclosed in the specification as filed.2  However, this means that examples incorporating the best method can be included in the specification at any time up until grant.

Patents Act including the “Raising the Bar” Amendments:

Patent applications for which examination has been requested after 15 April 2013 are considered under the legislation as amended. The new law provides that material added to the specification must not claim or disclose matter that extends beyond that disclosed in the originally filed documents.3

Amendments such as the addition of new examples into the specification are unlikely to be allowed as this would be considered as adding new subject matter. Consequently, in most cases the requirement to disclose the best method will need to be fulfilled at the date of filing.

Due to these stricter requirements, we suspect that invalidity as a result of the best method not being disclosed is likely to become a ground of attack more frequently encountered.

Conclusion

The best method known to the applicant at the time of filing the application must be fully disclosed including features that would allow the person skilled in the art to perform the best method. For applications filed and examination requested prior to 15 April 2013, the best method must be disclosed before the patent is granted. For such pending applications, we recommend reviewing and amending the application if necessary to ensure the best method known to the applicant at the time of filing is fully disclosed in the specification, before the patent proceeds to grant. For new applications, It will be more difficult to make these amendments as they will be considered to be added subject matter.

1 Eli Lilly v Pfizer Overseas Pharmaceuticals [2005] FCAFC 224 at [366], [370] and [375].
2 s.102(1) Patents Act 1990 (prior to Raising the Bar amendments).
3 s.102(1) Patents Act 1990 (incorporating Raising the Bar amendments).

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© FPA Patent Attorneys | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

FPA Patent Attorneys
Contact
more
less

FPA Patent Attorneys on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.