In re Trustees Under the Will of the Estate of James Campbell

Brief Amicus Curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation in Support of Appellee


This appeal presents an issue left unaddressed by the Hawaii Supreme Court in In re Robinson, 49 Haw. 429, 421 P.2d 570 (1966). Namely, whether the government waives a reservation of mineral and mining rights when it fails to raise and protect it in a Land Court title registration case, or whether government’s mineral and mining rights are inherent servitudes that need not be reflected in a Land Court decree.

Under Hawaii’s Torrens Land Act – codified at Haw. Rev. Stat. § 501-1, et seq., – the State of Hawaii (State) guarantees indefeasible title to the rights and interests reflected in the register. Land Court registration insures that interests which are not reflected on title do not exist, and persons who are wrongfully deprived of land or their interest through registration or the act or omission of the registrar are entitled to be paid by an indemnity fund, and the State’s guarantee operates against all claims, including claims by the State itself.

In the case at bar, the State is arguing that despite the absence of a reservation of mineral and mining rights and a flowage easement in a 1938 Land Court decree confirming title to Campbell’s predecessor, Campbell’s title is now burdened by these reservations. The State argues that these reservations are “self-effectuating” and inherent in title, and need not have been asserted and preserved by the Territory when it appeared in the 1938 proceeding.

This brief addresses two issues:

First, even if in the original land grants the State of Hawaii’s predecessor did not convey mineral and mining rights, they are not “burdens and incidents which attach by law” inherent in all Hawaii land titles. A reservation of mineral and mining rights could have been raised when the Territory appeared asserted other interests in the 1938 Land Court proceeding.

Second, the State’s public trust powers do not include the right to physically invade all property with water.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | State, 9th Circuit, Hawaii | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robert Thomas, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Robert Thomas
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert

Robert H. Thomas focuses on issues involving appeals, regulatory takings, eminent domain, water... View Profile »

Follow Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert:

Reporters on Deadline

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.