Burns v. Ferro , 1991 WL 53834 (1991) (Not Reported)

Burns v. Ferro - 2

more+
less-

The Superior Court held that material questions of fact surrounded the questions presented, and summary judgment was therefore not appropriate. Chrysler First Financial made loans to consumers that were used to purchase portions of an illegal pyramid scheme. Because it was unclear whether Chrysler was an "intermediary" as defined under state law, summary judgment was inappropriate.

http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/Burns_v_Ferro_2.php

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:State, 3rd Circuit, Delaware | United States


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Babener & Associates on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×