Calif. High Court Ruling Changes Class Action Landscape

more+
less-

“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.” The California Supreme Court could have been channeling Mark Twain when it rejected, emphatically, the unbridled use of statistical sampling to prove liability in a class action wage and hour case. In a unanimous decision, California’s high court in Duran v. U.S. Bank National Association gave the heave-ho to the kind of “trial by formula” that has become a feature of modern-day wage and hour litigation.

At the same time, the state high court restored some sanity to class action litigation more generally. While it might be tempting to view Duran as strictly an employment case, the far-reaching implications for class actions across the board cannot be overstated. Practitioners should review their existing California state and federal class actions and evaluate whether Duran can be used to their advantage.

Originally published in Law360 on June 16, 2014.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×