California Coastal Commission Further Solidifies Enforcement Powers

An informal Attorney General advice letter and recent legislation attempt to clarify the Coastal Commission’s powers in carrying out its enforcement authority.

The extent of the California Coastal Commission’s legal authority to enforce violations of the California Coastal Act, and how the Commission may conduct enforcement proceedings, remain significant issues for developers and property owners in the Coastal Zone. Recent developments have both clarified and expanded the Commission’s authority in conducting enforcement proceedings. The California Attorney General has issued an advice letter that appears to solidify Commission staff’s long-held opinion that the Coastal Act does not allow “ex parte” communications in the context of enforcement proceedings. In addition, a new California law provides the Commission, for the first time in its nearly 40-year existence, the ability to impose monetary penalties for certain Coastal Act violations. These two developments arguably provide the Commission with additional power to pursue enforcement of the Coastal Act against developers or property owners.

Introduction -

One of the more difficult issues that alleged Coastal Act violators face during the enforcement process is Commission staff’s long-held opinion that the Coastal Act does not allow ex parte communications between the alleged violator and Commissioners once an enforcement proceeding has commenced. As a result, alleged violators have been limited to presenting their cases to Commissioners only at public hearings where time to rebut allegations can be limited. On August 15, 2014, an advice letter from the California Attorney General was presented to the Commission that concludes Commissioners may not engage in ex parte communications in the context of enforcement proceedings.1 While not law, this advice letter solidifies Commission staff’s position, and likely ensures that alleged violators will continue to be deprived of the opportunity to communicate with Commissioners outside of the public hearing process during enforcement proceedings — unless and until a judicial challenge or the California Legislature addresses this “procedure.”

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.