California Corporation Fails To Persuade SEC That Cumulative Voting Proposal Can Be Excluded Under Rule 14a-8


Although Rule 14a-8 is a federal rule, its application often turns on state corporate law. In most cases, the state law in question is the Delaware General Corporation Law because companies subject to the SEC’s proxy rules are most commonly incorporated in the Blue Hen State. Thus, I’ve decided to devote today’s post and a few upcoming posts to some recently filed Rule 14a-8 requests involving questions of California law.

Last month, Oak Valley Bancorp unsuccessfully sought to exclude a shareholder proposal submitted by Robert P. Laukat requesting the Board to take the necessary steps to provide cumulative voting in the election of directors. The company argued that it could exclude Mr. Laukat’s proposal under Rule 14a-8(i)(2) because adoption of the proposal would cause the company to violate state law.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Allen Matkins on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.