Although Rule 14a-8 is a federal rule, its application often turns on state corporate law. In most cases, the state law in question is the Delaware General Corporation Law because companies subject to the SEC’s proxy rules are most commonly incorporated in the Blue Hen State. Thus, I’ve decided to devote today’s post and a few upcoming posts to some recently filed Rule 14a-8 requests involving questions of California law.
Last month, Oak Valley Bancorp unsuccessfully sought to exclude a shareholder proposal submitted by Robert P. Laukat requesting the Board to take the necessary steps to provide cumulative voting in the election of directors. The company argued that it could exclude Mr. Laukat’s proposal under Rule 14a-8(i)(2) because adoption of the proposal would cause the company to violate state law.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Business Organization Updates, Conflict of Laws Updates, Securities Law Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Attorney Advertising