California Court of Appeal Finds Possible Liability Under Privette Doctrine of Retained Control


In a recent opinion, the California Court of Appeal has added to the state's long line of "hirer liability" cases, which the Supreme Court has referred to as "Privette and its progeny." In Tverberg v. Fillner Construction, Inc., 202 Cal. App. 4th 1439 (2012), the Court held that a hirer may be found liable for injuries to an independent contractor who was hired by another subcontractor employed by the hirer, where the hirer's negligence in retaining control over the safety conditions of the worksite affirmatively contributed to the plaintiff's injuries.

In the Tverberg case, defendant general contractor Fillner Construction, Inc. (Fillner) was expanding a commercial fuel facility. Fillner (the hirer) delegated the construction of a metal canopy to one subcontractor, which delegated the work to a second subcontractor, which in turn hired plaintiff Tverberg, an independent contractor, to construct the canopy. Fillner also hired another subcontractor to dig a number of holes close to the work that Fillner was performing. Tverberg fell into one of these holes, injuring himself.

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Fillner. The Court of Appeal reversed, holding that Tverberg could go to trial on a theory of retained control, finding sufficient evidence to defeat summary judgment that "Fillner is directly liable for [Tverberg's] injuries because it retained control over the jobsite and itself negligently exercised that control in a manner that affirmatively contributed to Tverberg's injuries." First, Fillner directed another subcontractor to dig the holes and required Tverberg to perform unrelated work near them. Second, Fillner's employee in charge of the worksite determined that stakes and safety ribbons around the holes constituted sufficient worker protection. And finally, when Fillner told Tverberg in response to his complaints that the equipment needed to fill the holes was not available, this constituted an implied promise to cover the holes when the equipment became available.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sedgwick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Sedgwick LLP on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.