California Electronic Discovery Act: Part Four

Part Four in a multi-part series on the topic.

Searching for evidence in the form of email, text messages and instant messaging is increasingly important in lawsuits. However, requests for this type of evidence during the discovery phase can be seen as a fishing exercise and place undue burdens on the company who has to produce such, especially if the requests are not tailored to specific categories of information and limited. As a result, judges, applying rules of evidence, may be inclined to limit such discovery. For example, see the Model Order Regarding E-Discovery in Patent Cases, issued by an Advisory Council on the Federal Circuit. In states such as California, courts often balance the requesting party’s right to obtain broad discovery with the privacy rights guaranteed by the state constitution, especially when email is used for personal as well as business purposes.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robert Freedman - Partner at Tharpe & Howell, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Robert Freedman - Partner at Tharpe & Howell, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.