California Legislative Analysts Office Examines Fiscal Oversight System For School Districts

The California Legislative Analysts Office ("LAO") released a report on April 30, 2012 entitled "School District Fiscal Oversight and Intervention," in which it examined the State's fiscal oversight system for school districts.  In its most recent report, the LAO compiled fifteen predictive factors of school districts that face fiscal distress, summarized the current system for fiscal oversight and intervention, and assessed how this system is functioning.

Fifteen Key Predictors of School District Fiscal Distress

  • Governance crisis
  • Lack of communication with educational community
  • Lack of interagency cooperation
  • Failure to recognize ongoing budget problems 
  • Disconnect between personnel data and payroll
  • Limited access to timely personnel, payroll, and budget control data and reports
  • Lack of routine categorical program monitoring
  • Unsustainable collective bargaining agreements
  • Compensation increases in excess of state funding increases
  • Failure to maintain healthy reserves
  • Flawed multiyear projections
  • Flawed average daily attendance projections
  • Inaccurate revenue and expenditure estimates
  • Poor cash flow analysis and reconciliation
  • Categorical program increases in excess of categorical funding increases

Brief Overview of the Current System

The current fiscal oversight system was put into place by the State in 1991 in order to monitor the fiscal condition of school districts.  Under this system, County Offices of Education ("COE") are responsible for reviewing a district's financial condition at various points of the year.  Districts can be certified as (1) positive, (2) qualified, or (3) negative.  Districts that receive a qualified or negative certification are subject to COE intervention including, but not limited to, oversight by a fiscal expert and review of any new collective bargaining agreements.  If a district cannot meet its financial obligations, the State provides it with an emergency General Fund loan.  The Superintendent of Public Instruction then assumes all duties and powers of the local school board and appoints a State administrator to act on his behalf.  The administrator's primary goal is to restore the fiscal solvency of the district as quickly as possible.

LAO Findings and Recommendations

The LAO concluded in its report that the current system of fiscal oversight has generally been effective in ensuring the fiscal health of school districts.  The report notes that "the system appears to have reduced the number of school districts requiring state assistance and has provided oversight and support while still allowing school districts to have final decision-making authority in most cases."

The LAO recommends preserving the current system in order to ensure sufficient support to prevent districts from requiring intervention.  "The fiscal oversight system is especially crucial during challenging fiscal times, when school districts often must deal with uncertain revenues, large state deferrals, and possible trigger reductions."  However, the LAO cautions against the recent actions that the state has taken that have had the effect of reducing the ability of the COEs to use existing tools to monitor, assess, and disapprove school districts' budgets or certify districts as qualified/negative.

The LAO concludes that, "Given the system has proven to be generally effective over the last two decades -- during both good and bad economic times -- we recommend the system be preserved.  In recent years, however, certain state actions temporarily have reduced the system’s effectiveness.  In particular, in the last three years, the state temporarily has reduced the ability of COEs to identify districts on the road toward fiscal distress and provide these districts with additional oversight and assistance.  Moving forward, we caution the state against adopting these types of actions.  As districts continue to struggle in the aftermath of the recent recession, we believe preserving the existing oversight system is vital for fostering the ongoing fiscal well-being of districts."

The full LAO report is available here.  You may also follow discussion on this topic on our KMTG Education Blog.


If you have any questions concerning the content of this Legal Alert, please contact the following from our office, or the attorney with whom you normally consult.

Marie A. Nakamura or Meghan Covert Russell | 916.321.4500


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.