California Supreme Court Addresses Coverage for Product Disparagement

by Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
Contact

In its recent decision in Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Swift Distribution, Inc., 2014 Cal. LEXIS 3765 (Cal. June 12, 2014), the California Supreme Court had occasion to consider the type of statements that qualify as “product disparagement” for the purpose of a general liability policy’s “personal and advertising injury” coverage.

Ultimate Support Systems (“Ultimate”) sold the Ulti-Cart, a multi-use cart. Gary-Michael Dahl (“Dahl”) sold the Multi-Cart, also a multi-use cart. Dahl sued Ultimate, claiming that “Ultimate impermissibly manufactured, marketed, and sold the Ulti-Cart, and thereby infringed on Dahl’s patents and trademarks and diluted the Multi-Cart trademark. Dahl asserted that Ultimate’s false and misleading advertisements and use of a ‘nearly identical mark’ were likely to cause consumer confusion or mistake, or to deceive the public ‘as to the affiliation, connection, or association’ of the two parties. Dahl also alleged unfair competition, misleading advertising, breach of contract, and claims based on the violation of two nondisclosure agreements. The complaint attached Ultimate’s advertisements, which did not name the Multi-Cart or any other product.”

Ultimate sought coverage for the Dahl lawsuit under its general liability policy issued by Hartford, which included “personal and advertising injury” coverage, defined in relevant part as that “‘injury . . . arising out of . . . [o]ral, written or electronic publication of material that slanders or libels a person or organization or disparages a person’s or organization’s goods, products or services.” The policy did not define the term “disparages.” The Hartford sued for a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify Ultimate in connection with the Dahl lawsuit, and obtained summary judgment in its favor. Ultimate appealed, and the Court of Appeal affirmed the summary judgment, finding that the Dahl lawsuit did not allege that Ultimate committed product disparagement. The California Supreme Court granted review.

The Supreme Court noted that cases have understood disparagement, for purposes of the personal and advertising injury offense, “to mean a knowingly false or misleading publication that derogates another’s property or business and results in special damages,” and that disparagement requires “the defendant’s false or misleading statement have a degree of specificity that distinguishes direct criticism of a competitor’s product or business from other statements extolling the virtues or superiority of the defendant’s product or business.” In particular, a false or misleading statement: (1) must specifically refer to the plaintiff’s product or business, and (2) must clearly derogate that product or business. “Each requirement must be satisfied by express mention or by clear implication.”

The Court found no disparagement was alleged by the Dahl lawsuit, as it made no specific allegation that clearly implied the inferiority of the Ulti-Cart to the Multi-Cart. The alleged likeness of the two products was not, in and of itself, disparagement. The Court also noted that claims of patent infringement, infringement of intellectual property, consumer confusion, imitation, and “palming off” do not malign a product and do not constitute disparagement. Ultimate argued that in its own catalog, “the phrase “patent-pending” when combined with words like “innovative,” “unique,” “superior,” and “unparalleled” suggests the superiority of the Ulti-Cart and, by implication, the inferiority of the Multi-Cart.” The court held that the statements were closer to puffery (extolling Ultimate’s virtues), and not specific enough “to call into question Dahl’s proprietary rights in his product” or to suggest that the Ulti-Cart had any unique feature the over any competing product.

- See more at: http://www.traublieberman.com/insurance-law/2014/0616/4703/#sthash.AiChvsn3.dpuf

 

In its recent decision in Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Swift Distribution, Inc., 2014 Cal. LEXIS 3765 (Cal. June 12, 2014), the California Supreme Court had occasion to consider the type of statements that qualify as “product disparagement” for the purpose of a general liability policy’s “personal and advertising injury” coverage.

Ultimate Support Systems (“Ultimate”) sold the Ulti-Cart, a multi-use cart. Gary-Michael Dahl (“Dahl”) sold the Multi-Cart, also a multi-use cart. Dahl sued Ultimate, claiming that “Ultimate impermissibly manufactured, marketed, and sold the Ulti-Cart, and thereby infringed on Dahl’s patents and trademarks and diluted the Multi-Cart trademark. Dahl asserted that Ultimate’s false and misleading advertisements and use of a ‘nearly identical mark’ were likely to cause consumer confusion or mistake, or to deceive the public ‘as to the affiliation, connection, or association’ of the two parties. Dahl also alleged unfair competition, misleading advertising, breach of contract, and claims based on the violation of two nondisclosure agreements. The complaint attached Ultimate’s advertisements, which did not name the Multi-Cart or any other product.”

Ultimate sought coverage for the Dahl lawsuit under its general liability policy issued by Hartford, which included “personal and advertising injury” coverage, defined in relevant part as that “‘injury . . . arising out of . . . [o]ral, written or electronic publication of material that slanders or libels a person or organization or disparages a person’s or organization’s goods, products or services.” The policy did not define the term “disparages.” The Hartford sued for a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify Ultimate in connection with the Dahl lawsuit, and obtained summary judgment in its favor. Ultimate appealed, and the Court of Appeal affirmed the summary judgment, finding that the Dahl lawsuit did not allege that Ultimate committed product disparagement. The California Supreme Court granted review.

The Supreme Court noted that cases have understood disparagement, for purposes of the personal and advertising injury offense, “to mean a knowingly false or misleading publication that derogates another’s property or business and results in special damages,” and that disparagement requires “the defendant’s false or misleading statement have a degree of specificity that distinguishes direct criticism of a competitor’s product or business from other statements extolling the virtues or superiority of the defendant’s product or business.” In particular, a false or misleading statement: (1) must specifically refer to the plaintiff’s product or business, and (2) must clearly derogate that product or business. “Each requirement must be satisfied by express mention or by clear implication.”

The Court found no disparagement was alleged by the Dahl lawsuit, as it made no specific allegation that clearly implied the inferiority of the Ulti-Cart to the Multi-Cart. The alleged likeness of the two products was not, in and of itself, disparagement. The Court also noted that claims of patent infringement, infringement of intellectual property, consumer confusion, imitation, and “palming off” do not malign a product and do not constitute disparagement. Ultimate argued that in its own catalog, “the phrase “patent-pending” when combined with words like “innovative,” “unique,” “superior,” and “unparalleled” suggests the superiority of the Ulti-Cart and, by implication, the inferiority of the Multi-Cart.” The court held that the statements were closer to puffery (extolling Ultimate’s virtues), and not specific enough “to call into question Dahl’s proprietary rights in his product” or to suggest that the Ulti-Cart had any unique feature the over any competing product.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
Contact
more
less

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.