California Supreme Court Disallows Pass-On Defense in State Antitrust Actions


This week the California Supreme Court issued its most significant antitrust opinion in years, with important implications for damages claims for conspiratorial overcharges under the Cartwright Act by intermediaries in the supply chain, as well as for standing in California Unfair Competition Law cases.

Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc., .___ Cal. Rptr. 3d ___, No. S166435, slip op. (July 12, 2010), overturned the dismissal on summary judgment of Cartwright Act and UCL claims brought by several retail pharmacies against manufacturers of brand-name prescription drugs. Plaintiffs alleged that the manufacturers had unlawfully conspired to maintain prices for their drugs in California at levels above those charged for the same or comparable products in Canada, and sought damages under the Cartwright Act and damages and an injunction under Section 17200 of the UCL.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Antitrust & Trade Regulation Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Health Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Morrison & Foerster is an international firm with more than 1,000 lawyers across 15 offices in the... View Profile »

Follow Morrison & Foerster LLP:

Reporters on Deadline