California Supreme Court: Government Cannot Charge Fee to Redact Police Body Camera Footage

Best Best & Krieger LLP
Contact

Best Best & Krieger LLP

California Public Records Act Provision Permitting Public Agencies to Charge for “Extraction” Analyzed

Government agencies are prohibited from charging a fee to redact police body camera footage in response to a California Public Records Act request, the California Supreme Court said in a highly anticipated decision issued Thursday.

In National Lawyers Guild v. City of Hayward, the City charged the Guild more than $3,000 to redact medical and police tactic information from body camera footage. The footage was taken during a protest over grand jury decisions to not indict the police officers involved in the deaths of Eric Garner and Michael Brown, both unarmed African-American men. The Guild submitted a CPRA request for records related to the protest and, when they were assessed with the fee, they sued. The City said the fee was the result of about 40 hours of editing and was permitted under Government Code section 6253.9 in the CPRA, which allows local agencies to charge for “data compilation, extraction, or programming.”

The trial court sided with the Guild, but the Third District Court of Appeal agreed with the City. The California Supreme Court reversed and analyzed the word “extraction” as used in Section 6253.9. The City argued that it needed to “extract data” from the video footage when it made redactions – taking out certain audio and visual material that were privileged information. The Guild responded that “extraction” meant creating new content and not applying redactions.

The Court agreed with the Guild and reaffirmed that local agencies may only charge the costs of duplicating records and not other ancillary costs, such as document retrieval, inspection and handling of the files. The Court considered the City’s video editing as merely a more sophisticated version of redactions done with a felt marker on paper.

The opinion considered the nature of electronic records and the frequently burdensome task of redacting body camera footage requested under the CPRA. The Court stated, “Redacting exempt footage can be time-consuming and costly. But Section 6253.9(b)(2)…covers every type of electronic record. Whether the unique burdens associated with producing body camera footage warrant special funding mechanisms is a question only the Legislature can decide.”

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Best Best & Krieger LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
Contact
more
less

Best Best & Krieger LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide