Campaign Debate Over Medicare Could Ripple Out To Deficit Reduction Talks Next Year

by InsideHealthPolicy.com
Contact

If polls continue to show public support eroding for Medicare premium support and Medicaid block grants, Republicans might have a difficult time pushing those reforms next year during the deficit reduction debates, some health care lobbyists and political science experts said, but others countered that even if Republicans lose their White House bid, GOP vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan might return to the House a formidable national figure able to push for those changes. Democrats are pouncing on recent Washington Post/Kaiser polls indicating that Republican proposals for Medicare and Medicaid are faring poorly in swing states, and the GOP is swinging back by pointing out that Democrats have been in favor of premium support plans for decades.

Romney's choice of House Budget Committee Chair Paul Ryan (R-WI) as his running mate thrust health care reform to the forefront of the campaign, and recent polls by The Washington Post show that voters in battleground states trust the president on health care more than Romney. In Florida, 53 percent of voters trust Obama to do a better job with Medicare, compared with 38 percent of those who favor Romney, and 65 percent of Florida voters said they prefer maintaining a system that guarantees benefits over paying seniors a fixed amount of money to buy help buy either private coverage or Medicare. In Ohio, the president is leading 56 percent to Romney's 37 percent on Medicare. Polling on Medicaid is nearly identical.

Nationwide, Obama's health overhaul seems to be growing in popularity, too, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation poll. Fifty-two percent of the public trust Obama “to do a better job” in determining Medicare's future and 32 percent pick Romney. The same polling by Kaiser in July put that spread at 44 percent for Obama and 34 percent for a Republican presidential nominee.

Ryan is allowed to keep his seat in the House if Romney loses, and lobbyists and political science professors say that could set up an interesting dynamic. They note that Ryan and GOP Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) undermined House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) when he tried to negotiate with the president on deficit reduction. Boehner and House GOP leadership did not push Ryan’s budget, but Ryan’s budget passed the House anyway.

David Canon, a political science professor at the University of Wisconsin, said that if Romney and Ryan lose, Ryan’s negotiating position with the president will clearly be weaker. “If, as our Republican Governor Scott Walker says, 'elections have consequences,' then the consequence of a Democratic victory would be that their ideas on the budget should get a boost in congressional negotiations,” he said.

But Robert Blendon, a professor of health policy and political analysis at the Harvard School of Public Health, said that's not necessarily true. When Inside Health Policy contacted Blendon several days before the polls were released, Blendon said, even if the GOP were to narrowly lose, Ryan would return a hero if the House were to remain under Republican control and Republicans were to pick up a couple of seats in the Senate. In that scenario, the GOP would likely view the loss as Romney's fault, a matter of the wrong messenger delivering the right message, he suggested. Ryan would likely be considered a leader as the party heads into tough negotiations, he added. Blendon expects that Ryan has his eyes on the 2016 race, and to succeed, Ryan cannot be seen as blocking everything. That approach works when trying to make a first-term president look ineffective, but during a second Obama term, Republicans would have to build a record of wins, Blendon said. Ryan would have to compromise, yet still push through the majority of the GOP agenda, he said.

Blendon did not change that assessment when contacted after the polls were released, but he was more pessimistic. Although it's still too early to predict the outcome of the election, he said Romney now needs a major, national event to turn the tide that seems to be against the GOP's plans for Medicare. The GOP ticket must overwhelming win the over-50 voters to secure Florida because Romney is much less popular among younger voters, he said. But the importance of Medicare reforms is growing in importance, and Blendon said that by choosing Ryan as a running mate, Romney cannot distance himself from the House-passed budget that Ryan introduced and that includes the Medicare premium support and Medicaid block grants.

If Romney loses and Republicans also lose seats in the Senate and the House, Republicans will likely determine that the message was to blame, not the messenger, and that could change how they negotiate on health reforms next year, Blendon said.

But a Republican health care consultant said Republicans would likely continue to push for premium support, and he added that premium support is a vague and increasingly politicized term. For example, the Affordable Care Act provides tax credits to help individuals afford private health insurance. That could be considered a form of premium support, he said. Medicaid block grants are a similar issue. States need more control of their budgets and traditional block grants are one way to do that, but there are less traditional block-grant type approaches that also would give states more control over Medicaid spending.

A Democratic lobbyist said there has been a trend among Republicans downplaying the importance of polls because of what they perceive to be a left-wing bias, and that could make it less likely that they would view a loss as a rejection of their health care policies. That means that, in the event Romney loses, there might be a faction within the party that would argue that it wasn't the GOP's health reform ideas that lost the election so much as the presidential candidate. That would set up a conflict within the party over whether the GOP should back off of the Medicare premium support. Boehner would have to gauge that situation to determine what would allow him to keep his post, and he might need the votes of the most-conservative wing to do that, the lobbyist said.

Democrats are turning up the heat on Medicare, and the GOP does not seem to be backing down.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday (Oct. 2) will focus on Ryan's Medicare plan at a forum called Saving Medicare for Seniors Today and in the Future. Pelosi said last week that the election was about three issues: “Medicare, Medicare and Medicare." The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is out with its third independent expenditure campaign TV ad against Rep. Chris Gibson (R-NY) that ties him to Romney and his Medicare reform plans. “Chris Gibson put his party first when he voted to end the Medicare guarantee,” the ad states. “Gibson would make seniors pay thousands more, while millionaires get more tax breaks."

Meanwhile, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, Sen. Orrin Hatch (UT), issued a primer on competitive bidding that plays up historical bipartisan support for premium support proposals, including one by GOP vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR). The report points to private Medical Advantage and drug plans to bolster a call for private insurance. -- John Wilkerson ( jwilkerson@iwpnews.com This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it )

 

Written by:

InsideHealthPolicy.com
Contact
more
less

InsideHealthPolicy.com on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.