Can A Security Be Oral?

Explore:  Securities

Yesterday’s post identified some of the differences between the lists of securities in the California Corporate Securities Law and the federal Securities Act of 1933. One difference that I did not mention was California’s explicit statement that all of the listed items “are securities whether or not evidenced by a written document”.

This may seem to be an academic point, but the wont of a writing has saved at least one fortunate soul from the gaol. In Thomas v. State, 65 S.W.3d 38 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001), a Texas jury convicted a defendant of securities fraud in connection with the offer and sale of an “evidence of indebtedness”. On appeal, the defendant argued that an “evidence of indebtedness” must be in writing and the appellate courts agreed.

The drafters of the 2002 revisions of the Uniform Securities Act were cognizant of this issue and amended the definition of “security” in Section 102(28) to include “both a certificated and an uncertificated security”. According to the official comment, this change was intended ”to indicate that the term is intended to apply whether or not a security is evidenced by a writing.”

Hogamous, Higamous
Habemus, Habemas?

With the announcement of the election of a new pope yesterday, I noted several stories whose writers seemed to have forgotten their High School Latin. For example, the Christian Science Monitor, began this story with “Habemas papam”. The British paper, The Independent, also made the same mistake in this story. The correct spelling is “habemus”. In Latin, verbs are conjugated. The conjugations provide key information on person, number, tense, mood and voice. Habemus is in the first person, plural, present tense, indicative mood, active voice. “Habemas” is gibberish.


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.