Julie Hilden has written a very thoughtful piece (Should the Law Treat Defamatory Tweets the Same Way It Treats Printed Defamation?) (hat tip: Media Law Prof Blog) which explores whether a tweet (i.e., a post on the micro-blogging service Twitter, which limits individuals posts (or "tweets") to 140 characters) can ever be considered "defamatory".
There is at least some indication that US courts are prepared to conclude that tweets can be defamatory: in the Simorangkir v. Love case (which was settled for a reported $430,000) a Los Angeles Superior Court judge refused a motion to strike the claim based on a series of defamatory tweet. Canadian courts to date do not appear to have considered a defamation case based on Twitter postings (but see our recent discussion about defamation in the context of blogging: Baglow v Smith - The Increasing Importance of Context in Defamation Claims).
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Communications & Media Law Updates, Personal Injury Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Heenan Blaikie LLP | Attorney Advertising