Can an Old Dog Make New Gifts?: An Analysis of the Anderson v. Hunt Case and Determining the Standard for Mental Capacity to Execute an After Death Transfer by Trust


In the recent case of Andersen v. Hunt (California Court of Appeal, Second District, B221077, June 14, 2011), the California Court of Appeal articulated the applicable standard by which to evaluate an individual’s capacity to make an after-death transfer by trust. The issue in this case was whether the standard used to determine whether an individual has the capacity to amend a Will or Trust should be the “contractual” standard or the “testamentary” standard. The Court concluded that more complicated decisions and transactions would require greater mental function while less complicated decisions and transactions would appear to require less mental function. Thus the standard might very well deviate with regard to such different acts as making a contract, making a will and/or making or amending a trust document.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Wills, Trusts, & Estate Planning Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cooper Gordon LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »