Can Digital Goods Ever Lawfully Be Resold? A Legal Perspective...

by JD Supra Perspectives
Contact

"...for now, the only thing that is clear is that in the Southern District of New York, the transfer of a digital file from one computer to another without a copyright owner's permission violates the reproduction right." - attorney Lynda Zadra-Symes, partner at Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear

A recent court case in New York highlights the ever-increasing clash between copyright law designed for real-world, physical goods and a modern world embracing all things digital.

The key question in the dispute  - between Capitol Records and ReDigi, an online service which allows members to sell "used" digital music to others - is whether someone who buys a song on iTunes can sell that song to someone else without violating copyright law. And the answer is guided by the “First Sale Doctrine” in copyright law - which states that after a creator sells a copy of his work, the purchaser is free to sell it or destroy it without punishment, but not copy it. The right to make copies still belongs to the creator.

Capitol Records argued that ReDigi does not just transfer the song to the new buyer but instead makes a copy before uploading a file to its servers. The court agreed. A win for Capitol Records; a loss for the used music digital marketplace.

All of this begs the question: Can digital goods ever lawfully be resold?

For a legal perspective, we asked attorneys writing on JD Supra:

- Is ReDigi a One-Off or a Sign of Things to Come?

Andrew Ittleman, partner at law firm Fuerst Itleman David & Joseph:

“It seems that the Redigi decision represents a trend, not so much in the interpretation of copyright law or the first sale doctrine itself, but rather in lower courts deferring difficult decisions to higher courts or Congress. It is our estimation that this is why the Redigi court, for example, used such a literal interpretation of the first sale doctrine rather than address the much tougher issue of finding a workable solution that allows the doctrine to exist for digital media. We often run into situations like this when judgment calls need to be made by courts on controversial issues — and this is probably a good thing. Courts in the United States are designed to interpret existing law as opposed to write new law.”

Tammi Hill, associate at law firm Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear:

“It would not be surprising to see a court apply the reasoning in the ReDigi opinion to other types of digital goods. The ReDigi opinion's reasoning relies on the nature of digital information transfer, rather than the type of digital file. However, other courts not bound by the ReDigi ruling may see the issue differently. ReDigi's combination of uploading and deleting the original file during the sale process made it an ideal factual pattern to argue for the extension of the first sale doctrine to the digital world.  Another district court, or a circuit court on appeal, may disagree with Judge Sullivan's interpretation of digital copying.”

- Implications for the Broader Digital Marketplace?

Attorney Tammi Hill:

“Early in the ReDigi case, Google requested the permission of the court to file amicus briefing highlighting the importance of the application of the first sale doctrine to the cloud computer industry, which Google estimated was worth approximately $41 billion. Judge Sullivan’s order in ReDigi, which described uploads to a cloud server located in Arizona as reproductions, appears to apply to the cloud computing industry. In addition, since the filing of Capitol’s complaint, several companies, including Amazon and Apple, have applied for or obtained patents on second-hand marketplaces for digital goods. The outcome of the ReDigi case in the Southern District of New York could have far-reaching effects across all kinds of industries that rely on copyrightable digital files. The ReDigi case is therefore unlikely to be the final word on the first sale doctrine as applied to digital goods.”

- What Can We Expect Going Forward?

Andrew Ittleman:

“We are seeing a big shift in content and media from tangible mediums such as hard drives, disks, etc. to digital storage. We believe that this will result in one of two things with regard to the first sale doctrine. First, the first sale doctrine will be done away with entirely – but this is unlikely. If we look at the Supreme Court’s most recent decision on the first Sale Doctrine, Kirtsaeng v. Wiley, we can see that that Court was reluctant to do away with a doctrine that is so integral to the free flow of economics and the secondary marketplace. What’s more likely to happen is that  Congress will redefine the Copyright Act so that the first sale doctrine will better reflect modern technology.”

Emily Sauter, associate at Knobbe Martens:

“We will likely see companies interested in creating a marketplace for used digital goods come up with creative ideas in an attempt to avoid violating the reproduction right. For example, ReDigi has already claimed its new product, ReDigi 2.0, does not violate the reproduction right because the copy purchased by the initial owner is not downloaded to the owner's computer but is instead directed to ReDigi's server. Thus, while access to the digital file may transfer from one user to another when the file is sold, the file is never moved from its initial location on ReDigi's server.

At the same time, we will likely see content owners come up with creative ideas to prevent the resale of digital goods. For example, many content owners already distribute copies of digital goods through purported license agreements, as opposed to distributing digital goods through sales, because 17 U.S.C. § 109 only extends the fair use defense to owners.”

- So... Can Digital Goods Ever Lawfully be Resold?

Two different perspectives on this. From Lynda Zadra-Symes, partner at Knobbe Martens:

“Yes. First, they can be resold with the copyright owner's permission. Second, the ReDIGI opinion held the sale of the particular copy of the music file that was purchased by the initial owner would be protected by the first sale doctrine. Thus, if the owner sold the file in the form it was purchased, for example, by selling the device, computer or hard drive the file was purchased on, this sale would be lawful under the first sale doctrine. Third, the new ReDigi 2.0 service may be permitted under copyright law if no copying is involved. The ReDigi 2.0 service apparently allows a user to purchase and download a digital file to a single location on a cloud computing network. The user may then sell access to the file, allowing a new user to exclusively access the file without making a copy.

Additionally, the ReDigi case is only one case from one district court. The decision may be reversed on appeal, and/or other courts may not follow Judge Sullivan's holding. Accordingly, for now, the only thing that is clear is that in the Southern District of New York, the transfer of a digital file from one computer to another without a copyright owner's permission violates the reproduction right.”

And Andrew Ittleman again:

"Based on the holding and rationale in the Redigi decision, we would have to say no. This holding effectively made all digital re-sales illegal because, in some capacity, any transfer of digital media will require a level of copying/reproduction of the original digital file. This is what’s most dangerous about this holding. It results in a limitation of users’ ownership rights in purchased media under copyright law. So, again, without an act of Congress to change law, the answer to this question is most likely no."

- How Does This Contrast to the EU Approach?

Attorney Lynda Zadra-Symes:

“The contrast with recent European law is interesting. In a recent case, Case C-128/11, UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle Int'l Corp., 2012 E.C.R. I-00000, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/, UsedSoft sold a licensed digital copy of a computer program and a maintenance agreement for that program. The European Court of Justice held that the principle of exhaustion precluded a finding of infringement. The ECJ explained that, so long as the original purchaser made its copy unusable at the time of sale and the subsequent purchaser conformed to the terms of the original license, the sale was protected by the exhaustion principle. The ECJ compared the downloaded copy of the software to a CD or DVD which could be transferred, and thus it is likely that the ECJ would treat a digital music file similarly.”

Stay tuned; clearly not the last we have heard on this issue.

 

Written by:

JD Supra Perspectives
Contact
more
less

JD Supra Perspectives on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!