Canadian Marketing, Advertising & Regulatory Law Update


In This Issue:

- 1 Advertising Law News

- 21 Consumer Protection News

- 22 Social Media News

- 24 Focus on Food

- 30 Cosmetics/Drugs/Product Safety/Regulatory

- 32 Quebec News

- 33 Privacy News

- 37 Professional News and Practice Overview

- Excerpt from Advertising Law News:

Supreme Court of Canada: “Average Consumer” is “Credulous and Inexperienced”:

Bottom Line: Determining whether the general impression of your advertising is false or misleading can be tricky. For one thing, whose “general impression” is it that counts – the suspicious consumer or the credulous consumer? The Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) considered this exact issue in the context of the Quebec Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”) in its February 28, 2012 decision of Richard v. Time Inc., 2012 SCC 8. Surprising many, the SCC went for the latter standard – i.e., the “credulous consumer.”

Please see full newsletter below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Consumer Protection Updates, Privacy Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Aird & Berlis | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »