CA’s 20% LCUP Penalty Shouldn’t Apply to Compact Elections Under Gillette


Friday, Reed Smith partner and former FTB Chief Counsel Brian Toman submitted a written request for consideration at the FTB's meeting yesterday for the FTB to interpret the 20 percent Large Corporate Understatement Penalty (LCUP) to not apply to taxpayers that elect to use the Multistate Tax Compact method on their 2011 tax returns. The language of the letter is included in this alert. Regardless of the FTB's reaction to Reed Smith's request, we believe that the LCUP should not apply and that, if the Compact election is sustained, California's attempt to withdraw from the Compact under SB 1015 should be determined to be invalid. Thus, taxpayers who benefit from the election should seriously consider making the election on their upcoming 2011 returns.

Please see full Alert below for further information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Doctrine of Election, Franchise Tax Board, Gillette v Franchise Tax Board, LCUP, Multistate Tax Compact, Sales Factor

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Business Organization Updates, General Business Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Tax Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Reed Smith | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »