Dalhousie v. Aylward

Case Comment: Dalhousie v. Aylward

more+
less-

Summary Judgment in Nova Scotia, Canada, requires the moving party to demonstrate that there is no genuine issue for trial. When the moving party has made that showing, the burden shifts to the responding party to demonstrate that the case has a real chance of success.

If the Chambers judge must infer facts from the agreed facts in order to dispose of the case, where the agreed facts can support competing contested inferences, the case is not one in which summary judgment can be granted, since the responding party will succeed in establishing a real chance of success on that basis.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates

Reference Info:n/a | Canada

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Franco Tarulli, Haynes Law | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Franco Tarulli
Haynes Law

Franco P. Tarulli has been in the practice of law since 1997, with admission to the bars of Nova... View Profile »


Follow Haynes Law:

Reporters on Deadline