CEQA: Are time extensions for nonconforming uses exempt from review?

by Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP

Is an extension of time for an existing nonconforming use exempt from CEQA review? A new writ action just filed proposes to resolve that issue.

As a preamble, why should you care about a new petition in Superior Court? Good CEQA lawyers sometimes snag petitions filed in Superior Court on the theory that they might yield Court of Appeal opinions three years later, which may make some useful new law. Early anticipation of CEQA law may help other potential challengers to sharpen their administrative comments and writs, or conversely help developers to beef up EIRs to better withstand future challenges. Nothing causes a lawyer to swell with pride like being able to tell a City Council worried about a new court of appeal case that, "Oh yes, we anticipated that decision some time ago and built protections into your EIR--you'll be fine."

This petition, Protect Wine Country v. County of Riverside (RIC1407608), filed August 5, 2014, observes (correctly) that most jurisdictions require nonconforming uses to end "at a reasonable time," normally defined as that time which would allow the owners of nonconforming uses to get a reasonable return on their investments, while at the same time eventually creating zoning consistency. A new County ordinance, however, eliminates all time constraints on how long a legal structure or use can continue in areas where the zone has subsequently changed since the original approval of the structure or use. It effectively gives a permanent vested right to nonconforming uses regardless of future zone changes. It even allows nonconforming uses to expand by up to 25 percent with the same protections.

Petitioners Protect Wine Country filed comments on the EIR, seeking to enlighten local supervisors as to the errors of such an approach - especially the need for CEQA review - but the County stubbornly persisted. "No new land disturbance or development project is associated with this ordinance amendment and it does not commit the county to approve any new development." Petitioners, as usual, invoked Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, the private attorney general theory, entitling them to recover their reasonable attorney's fees should a court conclude they were right.

The early line betting tends to favor the petitioner again. Pundits are unimpressed with the County's simplistic analysis that since nonconforming uses are by definition existing uses, continuing them cannot have any significant new impacts. Under the prior law, nonconforming uses (which presumably have greater adverse impacts than what the current zoning would have allowed - that is, after all, how they got to be nonconforming uses) will have to terminate eventually, at which point they would cease having greater significant impacts. The new ordinance, however, allows these uses to continue past that point - indeed forever. Ergo, it will have greater significant impacts - which were not studied - violating CEQA.

The County of Riverside, never a hotbed of environmentalist fervor, is perceived as taking a more pro-development tilt in recent years; given the Riverside economy, that should come as no surprise (the snarky local joke is that Riverside County banks are enticing people to open new checking accounts by offering them either a toaster or a new home...and most people take the toaster). The County itself even labeled recent zoning changes as "business friendly" amendments.

This case will play out with an interesting cast of characters. Protect Wine Country, a group of local vintners, toasted with champagne when they obtained a writ against an earlier Riverside County ordinance amending practically all zoning ordinances in the Country of Riverside. The ordinance would have added language allowing uses not listed as permitted in a particular zone if the Planning Director determines the use to be of substantially the same, in character and intensity, as permitted uses in the same zone, - and exempted such determinations from CEQA again because they "could not possibly" have different, significant impacts. Petitioner's counsel in that action and this action, Raymond W. Johnson, has drawn criticism in some circles for filing large numbers of CEQA suits and settling them with attractive attorney's fees awards, although skeptics should note that when forced to trial, Johnson has won his share of such suits.

We will keep you posted.

Written by:

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.