CFPB Files First Public Enforcement Action Against California Loan Modification Operation


Taking a page from the playbook of the Federal Trade Commission, the new Consumer Federal Protection Bureau (CFPB) has filed its first civil enforcement action in federal court against participants in a Los Angeles-based loan modification program. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Gordon et al, initially filed under seal in the Central District of California on July 18, named California attorney Chance E. Gordon and The Gordon Law Firm, P.C., along with another individual and corporations allegedly involved in the program.

The CFPB sought and obtained a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets and appointing a temporary receiver; District Court Judge Ronald Lew granted the CFPB's requests the same day the action was filed. The action also seeks an unspecified amount of monetary equitable relief for rescission or reformation of contracts, refund of moneys paid, restitution and disgorgement or compensation for unjust enrichment.

The complaint alleges that the defendants charged advance fees ranging from $2,500 to $4,500 to consumers for mortgage relief services in violation of federal consumer financial laws, including the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA) and other federal laws governing mortgage relief services. The suit also alleges that the defendants made false statements about consumers' ability to obtain relief from foreclosures and reduced mortgage payments, misrepresented their affiliation with government entities and failed to provide consumers with disclosures required by law. The complaint does not specifically address potential legal issues relating to a limited exemption for attorneys under the CFPA, other than asserting that the defendants are "covered persons" and "service providers," as defined by the Act.

Although the action is based on various provisions of the CFPA and other federal laws governing mortgage relief services, it closely follows the form of typical FTC complaints and is being prosecuted by two former FTC attorneys who joined the CFPB after it began operating in July 2011. The FTC has used the strategy of filing an action under seal in federal court and seeking an order freezing the defendants' assets and appointing a receiver without notice in many instances.

Although this first civil enforcement action by the CFPB targets loan modifications, the FTC has previously brought federal cases against individuals and companies that market mortgage relief services, indicating that both the FTC and the CFPB may independently bring actions in areas where their jurisdiction overlaps.

Circular 230 Disclosure: To assure compliance with Treasury Department rules governing tax practice, we inform you that any advice (including in any attachment) (1) was not written and is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalty that may be imposed on the taxpayer, and (2) may not be used in connection with promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any transaction or matter addressed herein.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, General Business Updates, Consumer Protection Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Loeb & Loeb LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »