CFTC Staff Provides Guidance on Auditor Independence Requirements Under FCM Customer Protection Rules

The CFTC’s Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (the “Division”) issued an interpretive letter regarding the auditor independence standards included in CFTC Regulation 1.16, specifically as it applies to auditors of futures commission merchants (“FCMs”).   As discussed in the November 12, 2013 Financial Services Alert, the CFTC adopted rule changes designed to enhance the protections for FCM customers and customer funds.  Among these protections is a requirement that a certified public accountant’s audit report of an FCM state whether the audit was conducted in accordance with the auditing standards adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”).  The interpretive letter explains that Regulation 1.16 had been amended, in part, to be consistent with the auditor independence requirements of SEC Rule 17a-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 applicable to the audits of registered broker-dealers, but notes that the Regulation 1.16 is silent with respect to certain provisions of the SEC regime, such as those exempting auditors of non-issuer broker-dealers from partner rotation requirements and cooling-off periods for employment.   Responding to concerns regarding potential conflicting rules or interpretations applicable to firms dually registered as FCMs and broker-dealers, as well as concerns about potentially inconsistent treatment, the interpretive letter clarifies that if FCMs, firms dually registered as FCMs and broker-dealers, and their auditors comply with the auditor independence requirements in SEC Rule 17a-5, they will also be in compliance with CFTC Regulation 1.16. 

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this informational piece (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Goodwin Procter LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.