Challenging FIRREA Subpoenas: The RMBS Working Group Faces Subpoena Fight

As the Justice Department has stepped up its pursuit of financial institutions, there has been a surge of civil fraud lawsuits brought by the government under FIRREA — the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 — a law that allows the government to sue for civil penalties for fraudulent conduct affecting federally insured financial institutions. FIRREA has been used as the basis for investigations and fraud lawsuits against banks and mortgage lenders in a variety of contexts, including the rating and sale of residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS), government loan originations, conventional loan sales to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the supervision of payment processors. Using FIRREA, the government has obtained sizable settlements, prevailed in several recent court challenges to the government’s expansive use of FIRREA, and most recently obtained a jury verdict in the first FIRREA case against a significant financial institution to go to trial. Its statute of limitations reaches back ten years, and thus exposes to scrutiny actions the Justice Department perceives as contributing to the 2007 financial crisis.

Not surprisingly, in light of this surge of FIRREA enforcement, more and more financial institutions are finding themselves on the receiving end of FIRREA subpoenas, both from the Justice Department in Washington, D.C., and from U.S. Attorney’s offices around the nation. While FIRREA subpoenas are no longer a rarity, court challenges to FIRREA subpoenas — like challenges to most subpoenas issued by law enforcement agencies — still are. The prevailing wisdom has long been that challenging a government subpoena has no upside and poses great risk: Such challenges, the thinking goes, are rarely successful, and bringing a challenge risks incurring the wrath of the prosecutor, who may only become more aggressive, thinking the company has something to hide. What is more, when you file a court challenge to a subpoena, you immediately make public the previously confidential fact that the government is investigating you.

Originally Published in BNA's Banking report - December 3, 2013.

Please see full Article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© BuckleySandler LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.