This is a brief review of the Supreme Court's Mayo decision, which is more completely reviewed in the author's article in the Journal of Tax Practice and Procedure. The essential point is that the Supreme Court has eliminated the distinction between legislative and interpretive regulations, requiring that both be given heavy deference by the courts. As a result, taxpayers will bear a heavy burden to show that an IRS regulation should be overturned. The full scope of the decision will not be known for years, since other forms of IRS guidance, e.g., Revenue Rulings and Revenue Procedures do not go through the Administrative Precedures Act's notice and comment period, which is what the Supreme Court focused on in this case.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Constitutional Law Updates, Tax Law Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Bruce Givner, Givner & Kaye, A Professional Corporation | Attorney Advertising