Article by BC Personal Injury and ICBC Claims lawyer Erik Magraken discussing the Rule in Browne v. Dunn which requires a party to challenge an opposing witness on significant facts which are to be contradicted by other witnesses in support of the party's case.
DISCLAIMER
This article is authored by British Columbia personal injury lawyer Erik Magraken and pertains to legal matters in the Province of British Columbia, Canada. This article is posted for information only and is not claim-specific legal advice. The Author can only provide legal advice to clients. Please contact Erik Magraken at MacIsaac & Company (250-381-5353) or toll free in British Columbia (1800-663-6299) to arrange your free ICBC claims consultation.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In:
Personal Injury Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Erik Magraken, ICBC Injury Claims Lawyer, MacIsaac & Company | Attorney Advertising
